Skip to content

fix(tests): restore whitelisted smoke job in quantum integration test#471

Merged
Bryan-Roe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/repository-automation-e724
Jun 21, 2026
Merged

fix(tests): restore whitelisted smoke job in quantum integration test#471
Bryan-Roe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/repository-automation-e724

Conversation

@cursor

@cursor cursor Bot commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Hourly repo health automation failed on pre_commit_check because tests/test_quantum_integration.py used a non-whitelisted autorun job name (another). run_autorun_job validates job names before reading status, so the test never reached the list/dict status parsing logic it was meant to exercise.

Changes

  • Update test_run_autorun_job_reads_status_for_list_and_dict_shapes to use the whitelisted smoke job name in parametrized payloads and assertions.

Verification

  • pytest tests/test_quantum_integration.py — 2 passed
  • Full health cycle:
    PYTHON_BIN=.venv/bin/python .venv/bin/python scripts/repo_health_automation.py \
      --once --repair-status --refresh-stale-status --run-agents --continue-on-fail
    All steps passed:
    • repair_data_out_status (12 files scanned, 0 repaired)
    • pre_commit_check (2728 tests passed)
    • integration_contract_gate
    • run_repo_agents (status-freshness ok; docstring/marker warnings expected)

Co-authored-by: Bryan bryan@users.noreply.github.com

Open in Web View Automation 

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

  • Adjust quantum integration autorun job status test to use the whitelisted 'smoke' job name in both list and dict payloads and assertions.

Note

Low Risk
Test-only fixture and assertion renames; no production or integration behavior changes.

Overview
Renames the autorun job used in test_run_autorun_job_reads_status_for_list_and_dict_shapes from another to smoke in parametrized status payloads, the run_autorun_job call, and assertions.

This aligns the test with run_autorun_job’s allowed job whitelist so the case reaches list/dict status parsing instead of failing early on invalid job names (which broke pre_commit_check in repo health automation).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 633b851. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

run_autorun_job rejects non-whitelisted job names before status lookup;
restore smoke as the test job name so list/dict status parsing is exercised.

Co-authored-by: Bryan <bryan@users.noreply.github.com>
@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Adjust quantum integration test to use the whitelisted 'smoke' autorun job so the test exercises status parsing instead of failing job-name validation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update quantum integration test fixtures and assertions to use the whitelisted 'smoke' autorun job instead of 'another'.
  • Change parametrized jobs_payload list case to include a job dict with name 'smoke' and preset 'heart'.
  • Change parametrized jobs_payload dict case to use a 'smoke' key and nested job dict with name 'smoke' and preset 'heart'.
  • Update run_autorun_job invocation to request the 'smoke' job so it passes whitelist validation.
  • Align assertions to expect job_name and status.name equal to 'smoke' while preserving existing preset expectations.
tests/test_quantum_integration.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the tests label Jun 20, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🟡 Coverage — 2391c41

Metric Value
Total coverage 65.3%
▲ vs main +0.1%
Minimum threshold 60%

Updated on every push · 2026-06-20

@Bryan-Roe Bryan-Roe marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2026 06:40
@Bryan-Roe Bryan-Roe self-requested a review as a code owner June 21, 2026 06:40
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@Bryan-Roe Bryan-Roe merged commit 8c3a343 into main Jun 21, 2026
49 of 69 checks passed
@Bryan-Roe Bryan-Roe deleted the cursor/repository-automation-e724 branch June 21, 2026 06:40

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • The test now hardcodes the whitelisted "smoke" job name in multiple places; consider deriving the allowed job name(s) from the same source used by run_autorun_job (or a shared constant/fixture) so that whitelist changes don’t silently desync from this test.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The test now hardcodes the whitelisted `"smoke"` job name in multiple places; consider deriving the allowed job name(s) from the same source used by `run_autorun_job` (or a shared constant/fixture) so that whitelist changes don’t silently desync from this test.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔐 CodeQL — Open Alerts on this PR

Severity Count
error 10
note 79
critical 2
warning 7
medium 1
high 1

Copilot Autofix suggestions (if enabled) appear as inline review comments on the affected lines.
See the full list in the Security tab.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_ff725e8e-cf21-4c5c-999c-d89fe97a873d)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants